I found gaming in my late teens, a fantasy geek at birth, it was a natural fit. Like many of you I was weened on stories of Leonidas and Patton, Telamonian Ajax and Vercingetorix. From the first tales of these heroes I couldn't help but see their trials as puzzles, how would I fight the Nemean Lion; did William Wallace get it right? Imagine my surprise when I find others willing to draw the maze, construct the scenario, for me to work through. I fell in love, and like anything I'm passionate about I put a lot of effort into it. As I strove to get into the best games (read most immersive) I became convinced if I clearly defined my character in my mind and knew how that personality would react in most situations I was doing a good job. I was told I was doing a good job, we were having fun. We were wrong. We were role-playing.
What we should have been doing is called group co-operative storytelling. When we game from a narrow perspective we feel loyal to the idiosyncrasies and ideals we've written for our characters. What we should be loyal to is best place for the story. Everyone engaged and working together to create scenes where all have a place to shine. The parable of Earth Elemental Matt is what my group refers to when we bring up this lesson.
Earth Elemental Matt, (EEM) was a new addition to our weekly D&D game at our local game store. His character, a young earth elemental, had a below average intelligence and very little experience with the mortal world. We were excited, the fish out of water routine was a new idea. It was painful to watch, painful to be around. This player used character complications as feces smeared punji sticks for other players to step on. Want to comport yourself according to elven custom? EEM would pick up an elven holy relic and crush it out of clumsiness. Ask him to guard the door? He lets the goblins into the halfings hovel because none of them attacked the door. Once or twice and it's endearing, but he was happiest when he was smashing someone's plans.
What would have been better is if he turned those moments into scenes where the other characters teach him something. Make an amalgam of the other characters world views, take some fighting techniques based on what other characters have told you. It's not that high-concept gets in the way... this was a poor application of it. Serve the story; it belongs to everyone. Call me a communist, but ideas like a rotating GM, compelling an aspect and player created NPC's will do for gaming what Wolverine did to silver age comics. As people age and traditions form it's easy to lose touch with new thoughts on old ideas.
Am I taking a good thing and making it too much work?
Does high concept get in the way or is it the next step?
Are there evolved gamers out there making it work now?
I know somebody is playing Steve Long's stuff. (System wars aside it's the best source material I've ever seen; and before anyone says GURPS, don't forget I can take a bullet in my 6E Players Guide hardcover.)
- Gaming Tips
- Gaming Tonic News
- Helpful Links
- Passing the Torch
- RPG Product Reviews
- War of the Systems
- Review-One Die Short: A Web Series About Life, Love, and Roleplaying Games
- Is PC Death Enough Of A Death Tax?
- Reflections on Pathfinder Advanced Class Guide Playtest
- Initiative, What Is It Good For? Absolutely Everything
- The Undead Shall Rise Again and Again
- The Dungeon Master on Review-One Die Short: A Web Series About Life, Love, and Roleplaying Games
- Seeker on D&D Next Final Open Playtest Packet Reflections Pt. 1
- noesa on How Should We Craft Items In D&D Next?
- Ravenous Role Playing » Blog Archive » Friday Five: 2014-01-24 on Is PC Death Enough Of A Death Tax?
- Christopher Hackler on Is PC Death Enough Of A Death Tax?